The 137-word provision, which was enacted in 1996 after Art Modell moved the Browns to Baltimore, is either: A toothless, untested, unenforceable piece of legislation that has no bearing on the team’s ...

Back in October, the City of Cleveland said it planned to invoke the controversial Art Modell Law to keep the Browns from moving away from Cleveland ... again. This was in response to the Browns ...

As a refresher, the Modell Law, named after the infamous former Browns owner, Art Modell, requires Ohio professional sports teams that receive taxpayer funding for stadiums to either: 1.) ...

"[Christie's] support of these models, and the people who use them, rewards and further incentivizes AI companies' mass theft ...

It’s the latest twist in a struggle that has history and familiarity to Browns fans, who felt betrayed in 1995 when late owner Art Modell, unable to strike a deal with the city to get a new ...

It’s safe to assume that when then-Ohio Gov. George Voinovich signed the so-called “Art Modell Law” in 1996, the possibility of the law being used against the Cleveland Browns wasn’t on ...

On Monday, Cleveland City Councilman Brian Kazy announced the introduction of legislation to enforce the Art Modell Law, keeping Browns in Cleveland. Jimmy and Dee Haslam announced at the end of ...

The foundation of the lawsuit is the so-called "Modell Law," a statute passed by the Ohio General Assembly in 1996, a year after Art Modell moved the original Browns from Cleveland to Baltimore.

The controversial Art Modell Law has been cited by the City of Cleveland in an attempt to block the Browns from moving outside of the city limits. Back in October, the City of Cleveland said it ...

It's the latest twist in a struggle that has history and familiarity to Browns fans, who felt betrayed in 1995 when late owner Art Modell, unable to strike a deal with the city to get a new ...