Hosted on MSN1mon
Art Modell Law Cited by City of Cleveland in Browns Attempted MoveBack in October, the City of Cleveland said it planned to invoke the controversial Art Modell Law to keep the Browns from moving away from Cleveland ... again. This was in response to the Browns ...
The 137-word provision, which was enacted in 1996 after Art Modell moved the Browns to Baltimore, is either: A toothless, untested, unenforceable piece of legislation that has no bearing on the team’s ...
It’s safe to assume that when then-Ohio Gov. George Voinovich signed the so-called “Art Modell Law” in 1996, the possibility of the law being used against the Cleveland Browns wasn’t on ...
It's the latest twist in a struggle that has history and familiarity to Browns fans, who felt betrayed in 1995 when late owner Art Modell, unable to strike a deal with the city to get a new ...
On Monday, Cleveland City Councilman Brian Kazy announced the introduction of legislation to enforce the Art Modell Law, keeping Browns in Cleveland. Jimmy and Dee Haslam announced at the end of ...
It's the latest twist in a struggle that has history and familiarity to Browns fans, who felt betrayed in 1995 when late owner Art Modell, unable to strike a deal with the city to get a new ...
The foundation of the lawsuit is the so-called "Modell Law," a statute passed by the Ohio General Assembly in 1996, a year after Art Modell moved the original Browns from Cleveland to Baltimore.
The controversial Art Modell Law has been cited by the City of Cleveland in an attempt to block the Browns from moving outside of the city limits. Back in October, the City of Cleveland said it ...
It’s the latest twist in a struggle that has history and familiarity to Browns fans, who felt betrayed in 1995 when late owner Art Modell, unable to strike a deal with the city to get a new ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback