The 137-word provision, which was enacted in 1996 after Art Modell moved the Browns to Baltimore, is either: A toothless, untested, unenforceable piece of legislation that has no bearing on the team’s ...

"[Christie's] support of these models, and the people who use them, rewards and further incentivizes AI companies' mass theft ...

Back in October, the City of Cleveland said it planned to invoke the controversial Art Modell Law to keep the Browns from moving away from Cleveland ... again. This was in response to the Browns ...

It’s the latest twist in a struggle that has history and familiarity to Browns fans, who felt betrayed in 1995 when late owner Art Modell, unable to strike a deal with the city to get a new ...

It’s safe to assume that when then-Ohio Gov. George Voinovich signed the so-called “Art Modell Law” in 1996, the possibility of the law being used against the Cleveland Browns wasn’t on ...

The lawsuit arises under the Modell Law, which was enacted after the late Art Modell moved the Browns to Baltimore in 1996. “The Modell Law is clear: if you take taxpayer money to fund your stadium, ...

The foundation of the lawsuit is the so-called "Modell Law," a statute passed by the Ohio General Assembly in 1996, a year after Art Modell moved the original Browns from Cleveland to Baltimore.

It's the latest twist in a struggle that has history and familiarity to Browns fans, who felt betrayed in 1995 when late owner Art Modell, unable to strike a deal with the city to get a new ...

The controversial Art Modell Law has been cited by the City of Cleveland in an attempt to block the Browns from moving outside of the city limits. Back in October, the City of Cleveland said it ...